Homelessness -a view from the United States

Jun 29, 2017 | News

Homelessness: A View From The United States by Jan Rivers Scoop Media

She told the conference that the Alliance is not the lead body for working with homelessness but rather an organisation that carries out data collection and research, provides public education, policy and advocacy on homelessness and helps communities to implement homelessness reduction programmes. The organisation seeks to be a trusted partner of local, state and federal government, as well as the advocacy and philanthropy sector, and it has no equivalent in New Zealand.

Nan started out by describing some of the obvious differences between the US and NZ homelessness situations. “The USA is not a welfare state” she said “and there are no rights to social assistance or to meet human needs (except for the elderly and disabled) and what is provided is inadequate”. There is no explicit right to housing in the United States and the US definition for homelessness differs from New Zealand, meaning literally a lack of shelter. This is in contrast to New Zealand definitions where being in temporary accommodation, having no security, sharing accommodation, and uninhabitable housing are included. Scale is an issue as well – in the United States 565,000 people may lack shelter on any given night and over the course of a year some 1.5 million people are homeless for a period.

She discussed the levels of success that the plan had had between 2009 and 2015 where, despite rising rents, a tighter rental market and a rising population, rates of homelessness had fallen by 10% overall and by 13% for homeless families. She equated the NZ and US situations and discovered that despite New Zealand’s more liberal interpretation of homelessness, Auckland’s rough sleeper population has nonetheless been recorded at 228 people in the CBD. This is equivalent to Philadelphia, a city of similar size, where there were 225 rough sleepers in the central city. Given the additional tools that NZ has in its intervention toolbox, such as welfare payments, state and social housing, this close alignment in unsheltered people could be considered somewhat alarming.

She described the effective lobbying that moved the USA from a situation where there was little reliable homelessness data to one where there are now two datasets. One of these the Point-in-Time Counts, is a bi-annual community-by-community count which is tied to qualification for federal funding for homeless assistance. She described the reasons for the Unites States relative success and it is here that the differences between the situation in NZ and the US become apparent. The starting point though was the availability of reliable data, around which a plan could be structured and which has allowed for the creation of all the other elements of a strategy.

The US homelessness plan also included:

• An objective of ending homelessness
• A nationally agreed strategy
• Clear national and local goals
• A sense of urgency
• Policy tools and approaches
• The collection of data on what works best
• The ability to change direction, however hard, when approaches are not working.

Sub-elements of the strategy included the development of agreed approaches and pathways for working with homelessness. A Housing First approach meant that other issues such as drug and alcohol abuse or indebtedness were not hindrances to being housed. She made the point that interim and staged options for homeless people carried their own costs and that putting homeless families into emergency accommodation simply dislocates them from their schools and communities and adds expense, time and further disruption to the process of rehousing.

The reason for the positive results appeared to be that, as well as the plan, there is broad buy-in to solving the homelessness crisis in the United States from the US Federal government, state and local governments and NGOs, and there is an agreed plan. Which in our case we do not have.

Notes

There are regional homelessness strategies for Auckland, Wellington, Hamilton and Tauranga and a 2016 multi-party report from a number of political parties on homelessness which has 20 recommendations.

As far as data the best available for measuring homelessness appears to be from the 2013 census.

Nan was interviewed by Radio New Zealand

The two datasets reported by Housing New Zealand relate not to homelessness but to the house stock and the sales, vacancy management and building of state houses.

The MSD maintains a register of social housing demand, currently less than 5000 people but it includes only people who are identified as eligible for social housing. Eligibility for social housing includes beneficiaries and people who are employed at or near the minimum wage and their dependents and being unable to find suitable accommodation, ie you are homeless by the NZ definition described above.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1706/S00384.htm

Recent articles

Annual Report

2021/22 CHA Annual Report

2021/22 CHA Annual Report

Strategic Plan

CHA’s 2022-2023 Strategic Workplan

CHA’s 2022-2023 Strategic Workplan

Featured Network

Residential Tenancies Act Community of Practice

Residential Tenancies Act Community of Practice

Our Place

Our Place Report 2017

Our Place Report 2017

Case Studies

Media Releases

News

Newsletters

Community Housing Aotearoa newsletter – November 28, 2022

Welcome to our latest newsletter. We cover the latest staff news, we seek feedback on our Conference topics, outline what submissions are currently being prepared, plus highlight a number of community and partner events. Community Housing Aotearoa newsletter November...

Community Housing Aotearoa newsletter – November 14, 2022

Welcome to our latest newsletter. We cover the latest staff news, Auckland's CHP network latest event, we seek feedback on our Conference topics, outline what submissions are currently being prepared, plus highlight a number of community and partner events. Community...

Community Housing Aotearoa Newsletter – October 31, 2022

Welcome to our latest newsletter. We cover the release of our Annual Report and our AGM, we seek feedback on our Conference topics, outline what submissions are currently being prepared, summarise the VUW Interns' work to produce CHRA Registration and Methamphetamine...

Submissions

CHA’s Submission on the Charities Amendment Bill

CHA submitted to the Social Services and Community Committee on the Charities Amendment Bill. We supported a robust and fully inclusive review be done through an independent body to address underlying issues that our sector faces and ensure lasting charities. The...

Legislation

Reports

CHA 2022 Annual Report and Audited Accounts

What a year for our Community Housing Aotearoa Ngā Wharerau o Aotearoa team. Our Annual Report highlights our service delivery, including: - 16 submissions to central and local government. - 30 trainings and events delivered on topics ranging from public health...

CHA’s Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction Handbook

CHA has developed a Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction Handbook - with consultation from the NZ Drug Foundation - with advice for providers, tenants, and policy-makers. This resource can be read below: Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction Handbook

Research

Community Housing Aotearoa

Contact Us

Contact Info

Level 11, Ranchhod Tower,
39 The Terrace /
102-112 Lambton Quay
PO Box 11543
Wellington 6142

+04 385 8722

support@communityhousing.org.nz

Follow On